Guest chen lung Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 HKL must have either gone into the additional effort (!), or a bootlegger of some kind has gotten to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest luckystars Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 In theory, HKL could have an uncut print on the way, or they thought they were going to get one, and submitted a shitty old (uncut) print to the bbfc in advance?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chen lung Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 In theory, HKL could have an uncut print on the way, or they thought they were going to get one, and submitted a shitty old (uncut) print to the bbfc in advance?? The subtitled one is highly likely to be FS's Cantonese reissue version . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest killer meteor Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 According to Dave Foster of DVD Times, HKL's New Fist of Fury is 79min. That's 45min in PAL missing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spannick Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 so they got the "Remastered" Print by Fortune Star again, the cut-up crap. Germany is proud to have gotten it, too. and Japan. Thanks, Fortune Star! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Markgway Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 HKL also have an English dubbed version that runs 105m but obviously no Cantonese track (like the 79m edit) to go with it. It's obviously still missing 8m (which, ironically, I think are included as an extra) but would have still been better than the Cantonese abridgement (as that's not even the correct language anyways). If my calculations are correct there's 27m of footage that isn't represented on the HKL disc in any form (feature or extras). Poor show. An uncut (boot) version was available on VHS in the UK in the late 90s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest spannick Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 so the OOP Columbia RC1 Disc remains the best - and quite acceptable - bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chen lung Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 HKL also have an English dubbed version that runs 105m but obviously no Cantonese track (like the 79m edit) to go with it. Do you not mean a Mandarin track? What puzzles me is what this 105 edit is if the 119 is uncut (providing Columbia is PAL>NTSC) and the Cantonese reissue is 79m... so the OOP Columbia RC1 Disc remains the best - and quite acceptable - bet. Yep . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Markgway Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Do you not mean a Mandarin track? It SHOULD be Mandarin, but what I'm saying is that Fortune Star have given HKL a Cantonese dub for the 79m version only and not even for the 105m print, which probably didn't come from FS. What puzzles me is what this 105 edit is if the 119 is uncut (providing Columbia is PAL>NTSC) and the Cantonese reissue is 79m... I think Eastern Heroes' DVD was 105m. Missing 8-9m of footage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest killer meteor Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 The Eastern Heroes was missing all the pre-credit scene, along with Jackie being tended to by a doctor, and the Japanese banquet prior to Chen Sing's arrival. I suspect HKL sourced the opening from Eastern Heroes's reissue, which is the same source as the Columbia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chen lung Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 I suspect HKL sourced the opening from Eastern Heroes's reissue, which is the same source as the Columbia The Japanese DVD included the alternative opening so it's Fortune Star that gave it to HKL. What exactly was cut from the Columbia DVD? The credits sequence was from Jimmy Shaw I think. Only the Eastern Heroes DVD maintains the original 1976 credits sequence (and in a misrepresented 2:35:1>4:3 anamorphic widescreen too). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dager in the cotton Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 just wathced HKL's WOoden men and Snake and Crane, worst sound , the Mandarin track was about 2 octives to high and sounded like it was mixed in a cement mixer, wooden men no mandarin and alo badly mixed, both the english tracks were dull sounding . whats the point in having crisp picture with shite sound they went out their way to F--k em up, Why? my advice avoid em . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chen lung Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 worst sound , the Mandarin track was about 2 octives to high PAL is roughly an octive higher than NTSC, but are you sure 2 octives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dager in the cotton Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 no doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest killer meteor Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Shaolin Wooden men is a downmix from a 5.1 mix, I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.