Jump to content

The Transporter 3 (2008)


AlbertV

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Member

Wow, this movie is really, really bad. I think the blame lies with director Olivier Megaton who seems to not know how to shoot or edit a fight scene to save his life. Seriously, why hire Corey Yuen to do your fight scenes if you are going to cut ever half second? Here is the first fight scene in the film to showcase how bad they are:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="

"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Just a complete epileptic mess. The sad part is that nearly 60% of the movie is edited like this. Honestly, do we need three flash cuts when you are just showing a picture on a passport?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
Wow, this movie is really, really bad. I think the blame lies with director Olivier Megaton who seems to not know how to shoot or edit a fight scene to save his life. Seriously, why hire Corey Yuen to do your fight scenes if you are going to cut ever half second? Here is the first fight scene in the film to showcase how bad they are:

I couldnt agree more, I thought it was terrible! That Russian chick was terrible as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
doug maverick

actually im going to have to disagree with you guys about that. while yes the action is eh... thats not megatons fault corey yuen actually cut the action scenes, he is the producer and second unit director, you think he doesnt have the pull to cut his own action? this film was ten times better then the garbage that was transporter 2 which was a blatant rip off of man on fire. i also liked both the acting and the story on this film. althought the dialogue could've used some tweaking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1129442/fullcredits#cast

according to imdb at least, he is only the martial arts choreographer for part 3. he was 2nd unit director on part 2, and director of part 1, and there is a noticeable difference in the editing of those two, compared to part 3. my assumption is he didn't do anything else on part 3 other than choreograph the fights, and someone else edited them terribly, just like in War.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

This film is really very poor and by far the worst of the trilogy. Awful fight action, even worse car chases and overall generally very weak action for a film like this it doesn't leave much. The only positive was it was better than the last bond film Quantum of solace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I hope you mean the action was better than in QoS and not the MOVIE was better than QoS...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

i saw the film recently and, overall, i wasn't too impressed. i was surprised the martial scenes involved so many cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
I hope you mean the action was better than in QoS and not the MOVIE was better than QoS...

QoS was dire so yeah it better all round. QoS was the worst Bond for quite a few years imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I don't understand why everyone hates QoS, usually for the same reason they LOVE Casino Royale: it's different. Sure the action is subpar, but geez i thought it was great. Transporter 3 is on my netflix list, so i'll soon see if what you say is true, but i doubt it iMho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Not bad to watch as a movie. I agree the quick cuts really hurt the fight scenes cos there was some decent choreography but it was impossible to see! Disappointed that there wasn't much of an endfight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

I didn't care too much for this one. As much as I like Jason Statham kicking butt, the fight scenes were badly edited and all this talk from the girl talking about food was just annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I felt like 80% of the film was a much too close closeup of that girl's face. That one stray freckle she has that jumped ship and made it's home on her upper lip is burned in my memory forever. :neutral:

In the theater the action was cut so fast as to be unwatchable. But even when I watched it in slow-motion on the DVD, it was still cut too fast to be enjoyable! Shame, as in slow speed you can see from the tattered remnants, that Corey had created, and the actors/stunt people had performed, some really cool choreography.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use

Please Sign In or Sign Up